Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
3488 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320 +4379%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
192bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
24.00GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
3584
48
TMUs
224
12
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
230W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Vega 10
G92-159-B1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy