NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 69W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
Arc A350
+1095%
3.072 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GT 240
423
Arc A350
+665%
3239
Graphics Card
Nov 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
54.40GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
69W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT215
GPU Name
DG2-128
GT215-450-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
