Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 31W)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1275MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
848 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 240M
0.116 TFLOPS
GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps +1869%
2.285 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Aug 2020
GeForce 200M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1275 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
14
48
Shading Units
896
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.80 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
71.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.570 TFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.285 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
71.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

23W
TDP
31W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
TU117
N10P-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy