Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs AMD FirePro S9170

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
2744 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170 +2686%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Jul 2015
GeForce 300
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

9
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
44
72
Shading Units
2816
24
TMUs
176
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
12.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
187.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Hawaii
GT215-250-A2
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

43W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy