Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs AMD FireStream 9250

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (43W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250 +431%
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 300
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

9
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
72
Shading Units
800
24
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
12.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
187.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
RV770
GT215-250-A2
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Board Design

43W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy