Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (69W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 +108%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 300
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
850 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
27
96
Shading Units
216
32
TMUs
72
8
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
GT200B
GT215-301-A3
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy