NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro V7350X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1243MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
2208 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V7350X2
+2128%
5.728 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2010
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 300
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1188 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1243 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
69W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT215
GPU Name
Ellesmere
GT215-301-A3
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
