Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1845MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
1312 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 XT +1921%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2010
Release Date
Oct 2019
GeForce 300
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1670 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
22
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1408
32
TMUs
88
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
257.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

69W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
Navi 14
GT215-301-A3
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy