NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 vs ATI FirePro V4800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (49W vs 69W)
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 430
0.269 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800
+130%
0.62 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2010
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 400
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
400
16
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
-
-
-
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
49W
TDP
69W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
Redwood
GF108-300-A1
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
Fermi
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
