NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 125W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1312 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 430
0.269 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
+1768%
5.027 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GT 430
145
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
+4071%
6048
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GT 430
58
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
+4713%
2792
Graphics Card
Oct 2010
Release Date
Oct 2019
GeForce 400
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
22
96
Shading Units
1408
16
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
49W
TDP
125W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
TU116
GF108-300-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-300-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
