Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3744 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 430
0.269 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +6524%
17.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2010
Release Date
Jun 2021
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
3840
16
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Board Design

49W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
Navi 21
GF108-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy