NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 vs AMD FirePro W4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 440 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 440
0.311 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000
+307%
1.267 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 400
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
12.96 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
311.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
25.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GF108-400-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
