Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1 vs AMD FirePro W9100

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1 vs AMD FirePro W9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1 and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 520 PCIe x1
0.156 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100 +3257%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Mar 2014
GeForce 500
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
2816
8
TMUs
176
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.620 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
6.480 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
155.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
12.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

29W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy