Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 555M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 555M
0.389 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +3074%
12.35 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2012
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 500M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
24
144
Shading Units
3072
24
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.700 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
16.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
388.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
32.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF116
GPU Name
AD107
N12E-GE2-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net