NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 620 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 100W)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
5024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 620
0.269 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+8465%
23.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2012
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 600
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
40
96
Shading Units
5120
16
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
49W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
AD104
GF108-100-KB-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
