Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 vs ATI FirePro V7900

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 640 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 640
0.693 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 +167%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.216 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
28.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
692.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
28.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Cayman
GK107-300-A2
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy