Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
0.833 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM +600%
5.834 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Sep 2016
GeForce 700M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
34.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
833.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
34.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Ellesmere
GT 755M
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy