NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs Intel Arc A380M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 755M and 6GB VRAM Arc A380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A380M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 755M
0.753 TFLOPS
Arc A380M
+443%
4.096 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Jan 2023
GeForce 700M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.1)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1550 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
31.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
752.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
31.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
DG2-128
GT 755M
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
