NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 755M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 755M
0.753 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+1625%
12.99 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GT 755M
534
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+1244%
7180
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GT 755M
198
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+1783%
3730
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 700M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1635 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
31.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
752.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
31.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
AD107
GT 755M
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
