NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 820M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX110 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 30W)
NVIDIA GeForce MX110 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1006MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (40.10GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 820M
0.298 TFLOPS
GeForce MX110
+72%
0.515 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Nov 2017
GeForce 800M
Generation
GeForce MX(1xx)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
978 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1006 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
256
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.048 GPixel/s
12.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.10 GTexel/s
-
-
-
297.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
515.1 GFLOPS
24.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
16.10 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF117
GPU Name
GM108S
N15V-GM
GPU Variant
N16V-GMR1-S-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)
