Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD FireStream 9250

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (70.40GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250 +175%
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2009
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
800
56
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
RV770
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy