NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 4550
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 4550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (70.40GB/s vs 10.48GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4550 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
+278%
0.363 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4550
0.096 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2009
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
655 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
10.48GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
80
56
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
120W
TDP
25W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
RV710
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
RV710
(215-0725016)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
