NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 6450 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6450 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (70.40GB/s vs 8.528GB/s)
AMD Radeon HD 6450 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
48 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (18W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
+81%
0.363 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6450 OEM
0.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2009
Release Date
Feb 2011
GeForce 200
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
533 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
8.528GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
160
56
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.500 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
200.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
120W
TDP
18W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
Caicos
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
Junbonator
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
