Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
1680 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition +689%
2.867 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2009
Release Date
Mar 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.867 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
716.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
200W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Tahiti
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy