Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
3728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +4809%
17.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2009
Release Date
Jun 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
3840
56
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
Navi 21
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy