NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 435 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (70.40GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
208 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 435 OEM
+62%
0.589 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2009
Release Date
Jun 2016
GeForce 200
Generation
Arctic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
70.40GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
320
56
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.360 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
362.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
588.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
36.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
Oland
G92-240-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
