NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs Intel Arc A770
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
Arc A770
+4980%
19.66 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTS 250
1094
Arc A770
+1139%
13560
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
DG2-512
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
