NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 OEM and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 285W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
8304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450 OEM
0.451 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
+9678%
44.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2010
Release Date
Jun 2024
GeForce 400
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2340 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
902 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
66
144
Shading Units
8448
24
TMUs
264
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
66
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.698 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
18.79 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
451.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
37.58 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
106W
TDP
285W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102-175-KEF-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
