NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 OEM and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
2160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450 OEM
0.451 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+1170%
5.728 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2010
Release Date
Apr 2017
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
902 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
3
SM Count
-
144
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.698 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
18.79 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
451.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
37.58 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
106W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
