NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 106W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450 OEM
0.451 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
+267%
1.658 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2010
Release Date
Jul 2019
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
902 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
3
SM Count
-
144
Shading Units
640
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.698 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
18.79 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
451.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
37.58 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
106W
TDP
65W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
Polaris 23
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
