Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 vs AMD FireStream 9370

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 vs AMD FireStream 9370

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1050
1.862 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370 +41%
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 10
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1354 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
5
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
1600
40
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

46.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
58.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
29.10 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.862 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
58.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
Cypress
GP107-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy