NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD FirePro W600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1630
+138%
1.828 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1740 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
8
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
3.656 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Cape Verde
TU117-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
