Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1785MHz vs 1590MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1630
1.828 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +55%
2.849 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jun 2022
Release Date
Jun 2020
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1740 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
14
512
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
3.656 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
90W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
TU106
TU117-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net