CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs ATI FirePro V7800
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs ATI FirePro V7800
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
ATI FirePro V7800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7800 's Advantages
544 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+41%
2.849 TFLOPS
FirePro V7800
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
VS
FirePro V7800
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
18
896
Shading Units
1440
56
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Cypress
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon RX 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
5
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs NVIDIA P102 100
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy