NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
848 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+1726%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230
0.156 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Oct 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
6
896
Shading Units
48
56
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G94B
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
