NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+684%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jul 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
70.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
14
896
Shading Units
112
56
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
362.9 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
120W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G92B
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
G92-240-B1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
