CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 110W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+99%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM
1.425 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
VS
GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Mar 2013
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
86.40GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.85 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.39 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1425 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.39 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GK106
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Board Design
75W
TDP
110W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs Intel UHD Graphics 730
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs Intel Arc A310
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs AMD Radeon 660M
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy