NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Apr 2006
GeForce 16
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
-
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.440 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.880 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
NV43
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
NV43 GL
Turing
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
110 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0
