NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs AMD Radeon R9 270X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1590MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 180W)
AMD Radeon R9 270X 's Advantages
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+5%
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270X
2.688 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+101%
3566
Radeon R9 270X
1769
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1280
56
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
84.00 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
168.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
180W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Curacao
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Curacao XT
(215-0848004)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
