NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 330W)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (2435MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6900 XTX
+775%
24.93 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
2075 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
2435 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
80
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
5120
56
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
311.7 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
779.2 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
49.87 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.93 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.558 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
330W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Navi 21
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XTXH
(215-121000247)
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
