Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1125MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 30W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q +11420%
2.304 TFLOPS
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.23GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
1
1024
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.116 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.116 GTexel/s
4.608 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
G98
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
G98-700-U2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
80 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy