NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD FirePro M5100
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM FirePro M5100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (1200MHz vs 775MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+147%
2.458 TFLOPS
FirePro M5100
0.992 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+352%
3150
FirePro M5100
696
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
725 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
775 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.40 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.00 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
992.0 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
62.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Venus
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
Venus XT
(216-0846000)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
