Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD FirePro W5130M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD FirePro W5130M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5130M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1200MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +159%
2.458 TFLOPS
FirePro W5130M
0.947 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Oct 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.60 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
947.2 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Tropo
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
Tropo LE
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy