NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9700M GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+2382%
2.458 TFLOPS
GeForce 9700M GT
0.099 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+218%
3150
GeForce 9700M GT
989
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jul 2008
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
4
1024
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G96
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
NB9E-GE
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
