NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 485M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+178%
2.458 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 485M
0.883 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jan 2011
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
8
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.80 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
883.2 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GF104
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
N12E-GTX-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
