Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1200MHz vs 940MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +240%
2.458 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Oct 2014
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
940 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.520 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.56 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
721.9 GFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
721.9 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.12 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Topaz
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy