NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R5 M335
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M335 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+272%
2.458 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M335
0.659 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+916%
3150
Radeon R5 M335
310
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Oct 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.240 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.60 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
659.2 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
41.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Exo
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
Exo S3 PRO
(216-0867030)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
