NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1200MHz vs 1177MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2.458 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB
+145%
6.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
607 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1177 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
20
1024
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.50 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.16 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.026 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.026 TFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.16 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GA107
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
