NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 16GB VRAM RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1500MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (896.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2.458 TFLOPS
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile
+837%
23.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Blackwell-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
975 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR7
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
896.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
60
1024
Shading Units
7680
64
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GB203
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
45.6 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
378 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
7.5
CUDA
10.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
