NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs AMD FirePro M2000
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1485MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
+533%
3.041 TFLOPS
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jul 2012
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1350 MHz
Base Clock
-
1485 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
480
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
47.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
95.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
6.083 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.041 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
95.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Turks
N18P-G61
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
